Lacrosse season has begun. Unfortunately, here in DC the weather has not cooperated and my alma mater cannot make the trek from New England down to "Charm City". I can't wait to start watching the greatest sport this spring. In early March we have the Face-Off classic at Ravens stadium and it's Syracuse vs. UVA and Hopkins vs. Princeton. Last year the right teams won (Hopkins in a thriller in OT, and UVA which crushed Syracuse, yeee haw!) and I'm hoping that the same will occur this year, though Princeton has a great goalie this year and Hopkins is shaky in goal.
I truly enjoy lacrosse above all other sports, having played the sport for four years in college and a little in high school it is near and dear to my heart. Baseball was my first love and I'll always follow the sport, but it pales in comparison to my almost rabid devotion to a sport that is more entertaining than any other around. Football is an institution here in the US of A (I wrote some thoughts about that earlier), but it isn't a very, well, accessible sport as is lacrosse.
I can't wait to get my lacrosse fix satiated, come on inside and be one of us, you won't regret it and your wife will respect you in the morning.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Sunday, February 17, 2008
I've been avoiding this
Well, they lost. The only team to lose the one game that mattered. Damnit. God, that sucked, can't believe I wasted my Sunday evening screaming at the TV. Once Samuel let that ball go through his fingers I KNEW IT WAS OVER!
It was a good game, but the end result SUCKED ASS! (sorry Boondock Saints moment)
There's not much else for me to put down here.
Now onto more recent matters. Well, Roger was here in town (saw him from a distance much closer than usual on the playing field, psst, I work about 3 blocks from Capitol Hill so I run into a whole host of folks) and it was worse than sitting in the principal's office with a "he said, no I did, he did, I said" situaiton. I guess, do I believe Roger? NOPE, how can a person go from a middling career to averaging 17 wins for the next five seasons being over 35? Sure, hard work comes into it, but he had to have supplements that aren't usual. Nature is a cruel mistress. I'm 38 and I've kept myself in decent shape (meaning I'm no more than 20 lbs overweight at one time) and I've worked out, two times a day for the past year (finally paying off, now can someone stop the beer fawcett?) and my recovery after a Monday hardcore workout is three days. With steroids and HGH that would get cut by 75% so by Tuesday afternoon I'd be right as rain. It's no surprise that after the drug policy went into place Clemens' numbers went down down down and he was injured pretty quickly as was Bonds and other steroid users.
A follow-up question is this, why oh why does this matter? I mean, how is this different than a spitballer? I mean Hoyt Wilhem, Gaylord Perry, Satchel Paige, even Bob Feller (who's a bit high and mighty for himself) cheated, and Wilhem and Perry prolonged their careers with the spitter. So what that Clemens used supplements to increase his time in playing. Did it hurt the game overall? I mean, do fans really think that baseball is that easy and that if one uses supplements that it's cheating because so many do use them? Integrity smegrity, get over it. When I played Babe Ruth summer ball we had a kid on our team who used to rub the balls with chaw juice between innings to make them softer so the ball wouldn't carry and hit the jogging track in left-center. It worked. The other team's coach knew about and complained but in the end it didn't change much. I have a hard time seeing this as anything different.
It was a good game, but the end result SUCKED ASS! (sorry Boondock Saints moment)
There's not much else for me to put down here.
Now onto more recent matters. Well, Roger was here in town (saw him from a distance much closer than usual on the playing field, psst, I work about 3 blocks from Capitol Hill so I run into a whole host of folks) and it was worse than sitting in the principal's office with a "he said, no I did, he did, I said" situaiton. I guess, do I believe Roger? NOPE, how can a person go from a middling career to averaging 17 wins for the next five seasons being over 35? Sure, hard work comes into it, but he had to have supplements that aren't usual. Nature is a cruel mistress. I'm 38 and I've kept myself in decent shape (meaning I'm no more than 20 lbs overweight at one time) and I've worked out, two times a day for the past year (finally paying off, now can someone stop the beer fawcett?) and my recovery after a Monday hardcore workout is three days. With steroids and HGH that would get cut by 75% so by Tuesday afternoon I'd be right as rain. It's no surprise that after the drug policy went into place Clemens' numbers went down down down and he was injured pretty quickly as was Bonds and other steroid users.
A follow-up question is this, why oh why does this matter? I mean, how is this different than a spitballer? I mean Hoyt Wilhem, Gaylord Perry, Satchel Paige, even Bob Feller (who's a bit high and mighty for himself) cheated, and Wilhem and Perry prolonged their careers with the spitter. So what that Clemens used supplements to increase his time in playing. Did it hurt the game overall? I mean, do fans really think that baseball is that easy and that if one uses supplements that it's cheating because so many do use them? Integrity smegrity, get over it. When I played Babe Ruth summer ball we had a kid on our team who used to rub the balls with chaw juice between innings to make them softer so the ball wouldn't carry and hit the jogging track in left-center. It worked. The other team's coach knew about and complained but in the end it didn't change much. I have a hard time seeing this as anything different.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
well it's been a while
Here we are, it's the lull before the superbowl and as a Patriots fan I'm a tad impatient. It's not that I want the game to get started, I'm tired of the over hype. I understand that the Patsies are undefeated, but jeeez, calm down already. It used to be that folks were more concerned with the State of the Union address than something like this, but then we are a shallow people aren't we?
It seems that more folks are hopping on the Giants "underdog" bandwagon (ESPN devoted way too much time to "breaking down" the way the Giants can win. Of all people, Emitt Smith (I wish I could like the man, I just don't) is stating that a Patriots will win (oh no, a kiss of death).
As for the other teams that reside north of the Connecticut border, there's been a interesting spark of success. The Celtics own the best record in basketball (something I haven't seen in over 20 years) and my Bruins are actually several games over .500 (but please, for God sakes, CAN YOU BEAT THE EFFING CANADIENS?????!!).
Being from Boston and seeing how the success of Boston teams this year (Red Sox wining the World Series, the Patriots poised to win a fourth Super Bowl, the Celtics being the only team with fewer than 10 losses, the Bruins in the playoff hunt, BC football having its first 10 win season) so many folks are pissing on Boston. It's strange, I mean, coming from Boston one is usually bitter and pissy about almost every other place, now the tables have turned, how did this happen? I'm not unhappy about it, just a bit bewildered. I mean, I watched my Red Sox win not one, but TWO world series in my lifetime. My Grandmother who passed away in 1986 is the only other person who saw the Red Sox win more than one championship. I grew up watching Bobby Orr score against St. Louis, and then Havelchek, and then Cowens, and the big three (Bird, McHale, Parrish) win as well. The Patriots barely registered (nor did the Eagles for that matter until a little guy from Natick won the Heisman and showed that Massholes can play something other than bitching-n-moaning). Now the riches of being a Boston sports fan is, well, overwhelming. I don't need to buy a Patriots hat or jersey, every friggin' cheeseball's done that for me.
Back to Super Sunday - I'm more than a little disappointed that I have to listen to Joe Buck for another championship (I muted the World Series for the most part so I didn't have to listen to that idiot McCarver). I don't mind Troy Aikman, though his Okie plainsian accent grates my east coast snobbish ears, but Joe Buck tires me out. He seems to be sleepwalking at times. I like Nance and Simms, his drawl is more sing-song and easier on my otic aesthetics. No Madden this year (phew!), and for goodness sakes, no Gumbels either (amen and amen). I miss Dick Enberg with his "Oh My!", he's great, one of the best play by play I've ever heard.
So predictions? From me? Nope, I'm just hoping that history is made by the team that used to play in a Jr. High stadium named Schaefer (shyte beer btw). I've never been to Gillette stadium, is the parking better than it was with the old stadium?
It seems that more folks are hopping on the Giants "underdog" bandwagon (ESPN devoted way too much time to "breaking down" the way the Giants can win. Of all people, Emitt Smith (I wish I could like the man, I just don't) is stating that a Patriots will win (oh no, a kiss of death).
As for the other teams that reside north of the Connecticut border, there's been a interesting spark of success. The Celtics own the best record in basketball (something I haven't seen in over 20 years) and my Bruins are actually several games over .500 (but please, for God sakes, CAN YOU BEAT THE EFFING CANADIENS?????!!).
Being from Boston and seeing how the success of Boston teams this year (Red Sox wining the World Series, the Patriots poised to win a fourth Super Bowl, the Celtics being the only team with fewer than 10 losses, the Bruins in the playoff hunt, BC football having its first 10 win season) so many folks are pissing on Boston. It's strange, I mean, coming from Boston one is usually bitter and pissy about almost every other place, now the tables have turned, how did this happen? I'm not unhappy about it, just a bit bewildered. I mean, I watched my Red Sox win not one, but TWO world series in my lifetime. My Grandmother who passed away in 1986 is the only other person who saw the Red Sox win more than one championship. I grew up watching Bobby Orr score against St. Louis, and then Havelchek, and then Cowens, and the big three (Bird, McHale, Parrish) win as well. The Patriots barely registered (nor did the Eagles for that matter until a little guy from Natick won the Heisman and showed that Massholes can play something other than bitching-n-moaning). Now the riches of being a Boston sports fan is, well, overwhelming. I don't need to buy a Patriots hat or jersey, every friggin' cheeseball's done that for me.
Back to Super Sunday - I'm more than a little disappointed that I have to listen to Joe Buck for another championship (I muted the World Series for the most part so I didn't have to listen to that idiot McCarver). I don't mind Troy Aikman, though his Okie plainsian accent grates my east coast snobbish ears, but Joe Buck tires me out. He seems to be sleepwalking at times. I like Nance and Simms, his drawl is more sing-song and easier on my otic aesthetics. No Madden this year (phew!), and for goodness sakes, no Gumbels either (amen and amen). I miss Dick Enberg with his "Oh My!", he's great, one of the best play by play I've ever heard.
So predictions? From me? Nope, I'm just hoping that history is made by the team that used to play in a Jr. High stadium named Schaefer (shyte beer btw). I've never been to Gillette stadium, is the parking better than it was with the old stadium?
Friday, December 14, 2007
Steroids and other stuff
Well, the report is out. Gawhge Mitchell gave his press conference yesterday. I was laughing at parts because his Maine accent was coming out with "pahrhaps". Killed me. Steroids - it's hardly surprising that folks used steroids to get ahead. Athletes are always looking for an edge (coaches are doing that as well, but using video tape). What's kinda confusing is that names were put out there and put athletes in the position of answering the no-win question like "so, when did you stop beating your wife?"
It is disappointing that Roger Clemens name was part of this sordid tale. It is, however, a very plausible explanation of how he became better AFTER leaving the Red Sox and got HUGE in Toronto. The baseball writers and players on ESPN and FSN were pooh poohing this trainer's word, pointing out that he gave this information out because he was going down. The double standard is bogus. Love or hate Barry Bonds (I can't stand the man, he's a prick to fans), he get's the worst of the bile and it turns out the pitching counterpart to the best hitter in the past 25 years used 'roids, supposedly.
On to college football. People, mainly couch potato fans who never played football beyond flag football in gym class, are complaining about the season and how there needs to be a playoff. BULLSHYTE! College football doesn't NEED a playoff, only the pundits who claim that stuff. There is not one good reason to have a playoff for D1 football - the only reason? BETTING. There is too much money right now in the bowl system as it is and to introduce a playoff system under the current bowl scenario would extend the season beyond the superbowl, possibly. There is not any reason for a playoff. The other football divisions have a playoff, but the tradition of bowls for DI goes back before there was ever a playoff system in college. Sorry, for those football fans who are dim (which means most of them), keep the bowl system as it is.
It is disappointing that Roger Clemens name was part of this sordid tale. It is, however, a very plausible explanation of how he became better AFTER leaving the Red Sox and got HUGE in Toronto. The baseball writers and players on ESPN and FSN were pooh poohing this trainer's word, pointing out that he gave this information out because he was going down. The double standard is bogus. Love or hate Barry Bonds (I can't stand the man, he's a prick to fans), he get's the worst of the bile and it turns out the pitching counterpart to the best hitter in the past 25 years used 'roids, supposedly.
On to college football. People, mainly couch potato fans who never played football beyond flag football in gym class, are complaining about the season and how there needs to be a playoff. BULLSHYTE! College football doesn't NEED a playoff, only the pundits who claim that stuff. There is not one good reason to have a playoff for D1 football - the only reason? BETTING. There is too much money right now in the bowl system as it is and to introduce a playoff system under the current bowl scenario would extend the season beyond the superbowl, possibly. There is not any reason for a playoff. The other football divisions have a playoff, but the tradition of bowls for DI goes back before there was ever a playoff system in college. Sorry, for those football fans who are dim (which means most of them), keep the bowl system as it is.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
When Hockey was more interesting
So, in the course of my chronic insomnia I was watching the NHL channel and I caught the 1979 Stanley Cup semi-finals between Boston and Montreal. Game went down to the wire but I was struck by how very cool hockey was back then (especially with Don Cherry behind the bench for my B's). Peter McNab, Rick Middleton, Terry O'Reilly, Mike Milbury, etc etc etc. Great teams and almost all of them played without a helmet (wasn't until the early 80's where the helmet rules were put in place). As a post-collegiate lacrosse player who played with a ton of hockey players, we had more to talk about then just lax.
I live in DC, but there are times when I really miss this time of year in Boston. High School hockey is in the first part of their season, college hockey is up and running, and the early morning trips to the rink with dad are the true causes of morning traffic on a Saturday morning. The greatest hockey tournament comes in February with the Beanpot featuring the four universities in Boston. Harvard, BU, BC, and Northeastern hit the ice the first two mondays in February and the winner gets bragging rights for a whole year. In Boston (prior to the Red Sox and the Patriots winning, bragging and Boston weren't very friendly) having bragging rights is huge, huge. The winner of the tournament almost always makes the D1 tourney (most of the time the winner makes it to the Frozen Four). I miss hockey, good hockey. You just don't get it down here in DC and most folks treat it as a small amusement. Hockey is a great sport, with sick hits and amazing athletes, and it's a blast to watch.
I live in DC, but there are times when I really miss this time of year in Boston. High School hockey is in the first part of their season, college hockey is up and running, and the early morning trips to the rink with dad are the true causes of morning traffic on a Saturday morning. The greatest hockey tournament comes in February with the Beanpot featuring the four universities in Boston. Harvard, BU, BC, and Northeastern hit the ice the first two mondays in February and the winner gets bragging rights for a whole year. In Boston (prior to the Red Sox and the Patriots winning, bragging and Boston weren't very friendly) having bragging rights is huge, huge. The winner of the tournament almost always makes the D1 tourney (most of the time the winner makes it to the Frozen Four). I miss hockey, good hockey. You just don't get it down here in DC and most folks treat it as a small amusement. Hockey is a great sport, with sick hits and amazing athletes, and it's a blast to watch.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Some folks are just, well, haters
Well, it's another Monday and the Patriots are 13-0, undefeated in other words. They have played stunning football at times and pedestrian at other times. Yet, they are unbeaten. Listening here in DC, the Junkies are trying to speculate who could beat the Patriots. Strange how folks seem to think that the Patriots can be beaten by "scoring a lot of points." There is only two ways the Patriots are beatable - turnovers and injuries. The Ravens game was the closest to a loss that came out a win since Nebraska came back to beat Missouri back in the late 90's.
In watching the Patriots yesterday I was struck by the sheer brilliance that the Patriots have on offense in the passing game. Having four athletic receivers and solid tight ends who can catch (for the most part, Watson seems to cough up some easy ones) and then having Faulk run a hitch/screen out of the backfield makes defenses weary.
I was fortunate that I was able to watch the game since it was my youngest son's 4th birthday but I also had some evacuation situations to handle to I was downstairs in and out of the bathroom while my in-laws/wife/friends/kids were upstairs making a racket. It was great to watch that trick play, double lateral, and burn that big mouth safety from Pittsburgh.
In watching the Patriots yesterday I was struck by the sheer brilliance that the Patriots have on offense in the passing game. Having four athletic receivers and solid tight ends who can catch (for the most part, Watson seems to cough up some easy ones) and then having Faulk run a hitch/screen out of the backfield makes defenses weary.
I was fortunate that I was able to watch the game since it was my youngest son's 4th birthday but I also had some evacuation situations to handle to I was downstairs in and out of the bathroom while my in-laws/wife/friends/kids were upstairs making a racket. It was great to watch that trick play, double lateral, and burn that big mouth safety from Pittsburgh.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Why Redskins fans are homers
Far be it for me to call most other fans homers but Redskins fans are really weird. I do NOT understand how they think that the Redskins are a good team or that the team "has all the pieces". Listening to the Junkies this morning and I'm struck by how dense these folks are. A lot of complainers have balanced things out, but with both daily newspapers spending 11 PAGES! to the Redskins, this is HOMERVILLE!
I love living down here - the weather is better than it was in Boston where I grew up, folks don't cut you off every 10 feet, but it's just plain STUPID how the Redskins are WORSHIPPED here. Every Redskins game gets FRONTPAGE coverage on the Washington Post - what in the world is that about? The Redskins deserve FRONTPAGE coverage when they suck? I understand with Sean Taylor getting killed last week, that's different and I understand how that would be of high interest. However, EVERY GAME other than yesterday deserve front page coverage? When most of the coverage is such homer junk?
I find that sports journalists are less journalists and more knuckleheads. I've yet to see a good columnist who actually KNOWS the sport they're covering, ALSO, how about actually PLAYED the sport or ANY sport for that matter. I'm convinced that most sports writers aren't very intelligent, they're just overpaid fans who'd sacrifice their first born to talk to __________ __________ (fill in the blanks for your favorite sports personage).
I understand that folks love sports, but please, could we please, please, stop being homers? Painting one's body or wearing "gear" ALL WEEK LONG. Sorry, but getting a letterman jacket of your favorite sports team is just dumb. I have a fleece and three hats of my beloved Red Sox, THAT'S IT! I'm a huge Sox fan but I'm not getting matching sweat suits or getting a whole mug set. That's for the Jimmy Fallons out there, the "superfans" who are just homers. Be a fan, but don't spend your extra cash on "your team's" stuff.
Redskins fans, Steelers fans, and Cowboys fans here in DC are the most ridiculous human beings I've ever seen. My word, flags, vanity plates for the car, flags on the car, coloring your car with your team's colors, and all that nonsense is just dumb. You're not a person any more, you are a headless sheep.
I love living down here - the weather is better than it was in Boston where I grew up, folks don't cut you off every 10 feet, but it's just plain STUPID how the Redskins are WORSHIPPED here. Every Redskins game gets FRONTPAGE coverage on the Washington Post - what in the world is that about? The Redskins deserve FRONTPAGE coverage when they suck? I understand with Sean Taylor getting killed last week, that's different and I understand how that would be of high interest. However, EVERY GAME other than yesterday deserve front page coverage? When most of the coverage is such homer junk?
I find that sports journalists are less journalists and more knuckleheads. I've yet to see a good columnist who actually KNOWS the sport they're covering, ALSO, how about actually PLAYED the sport or ANY sport for that matter. I'm convinced that most sports writers aren't very intelligent, they're just overpaid fans who'd sacrifice their first born to talk to __________ __________ (fill in the blanks for your favorite sports personage).
I understand that folks love sports, but please, could we please, please, stop being homers? Painting one's body or wearing "gear" ALL WEEK LONG. Sorry, but getting a letterman jacket of your favorite sports team is just dumb. I have a fleece and three hats of my beloved Red Sox, THAT'S IT! I'm a huge Sox fan but I'm not getting matching sweat suits or getting a whole mug set. That's for the Jimmy Fallons out there, the "superfans" who are just homers. Be a fan, but don't spend your extra cash on "your team's" stuff.
Redskins fans, Steelers fans, and Cowboys fans here in DC are the most ridiculous human beings I've ever seen. My word, flags, vanity plates for the car, flags on the car, coloring your car with your team's colors, and all that nonsense is just dumb. You're not a person any more, you are a headless sheep.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
